Estimating gas masses and dust-to-gas ratios from optical spectroscopy
Jarle Brinchmann, St\'ephane Charlot, Guinevere Kauffmann, Tim, Heckman, Simon D. M. White, Christy Tremonti

TL;DR
This paper introduces a novel optical spectroscopy method to estimate gas masses and dust-to-gas ratios in distant galaxies, providing results consistent with traditional gas measurements without relying on CO-to-H2 conversion factors.
Contribution
The study presents a new technique using optical spectra and photo-ionization models to determine gas and dust properties, independent of CO-based methods, and applies it to a large galaxy sample from SDSS.
Findings
Accurately recovers total gas surface density within a factor of 2 for nearby galaxies.
Shows the dust-to-gas ratio depends on metallicity and aligns with FIR-based models.
Identifies galaxy populations with low star density and long gas depletion times.
Abstract
We present a method to estimate the total gas column density, dust-to-gas and dust-to-metal ratios of distant galaxies from rest-frame optical spectra. The technique exploits the sensitivity of certain optical lines to changes in depletion of metals onto dust grains and uses photo-ionization models to constrain these physical ratios along with the metallicity (Z) and dust column density. We compare our gas column density estimates with HI and CO gas mass estimates in nearby galaxies to show that we recover their total gas mass surface density to within a factor of 2 up to a total surface gas mass density of ~75 Mo/pc^2. Our technique is independent of the conversion factor of CO to H2 and we show that a Z-dependent XCO is required to achieve good agreement between our measurements and that provided by CO and HI. However we also show that our method can not be reliably aperture corrected…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
