Model comparison of the dark matter profiles of Fornax, Sculptor, Carina and Sextans
M.A. Breddels, A. Helmi

TL;DR
This study uses orbit-based dynamical models and Bayesian evidence to compare dark matter profiles in four dwarf spheroidal galaxies, finding no single profile fits all, but consistent mass distributions suggest strong constraints for cosmological models.
Contribution
It provides a comparative analysis of dark matter profiles in multiple dwarf galaxies using Bayesian methods, highlighting the diversity and constraints on dark matter models.
Findings
No preference for specific parametric profiles per galaxy.
Combined evidence disfavors identical cored profiles for all galaxies.
Consistent mass distribution across galaxies from r_{-3} to outer data points.
Abstract
We use orbit based dynamical models to fit the 2nd and 4th moments of the line of sight velocity distributions of the Fornax, Sculptor, Carina and Sextans dwarf spheroidal galaxies. Our goal is to compare dark matter profile models of these four systems using Bayesian evidence. We consider NFW, Einasto and several cored profiles for their dark halos and present the probability distribution functions of the model parameters. When considering each system separately, we find there is no preference for one of these specific parametric density profiles. However, the combined evidence shows that it is unlikely that all galaxies are embedded in the same type of cored profiles of the form \rho_{DM} \propto 1/(1 + r^2)^{\beta/2}, where \beta = 3, 4. For each galaxy, we also obtain an almost model independent, and therefore accurate, measurement of the logarithmic slope of the dark matter density…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
