The velocity dispersion profile of NGC 6388 from resolved-star spectroscopy: no evidence of a central cusp and new constraints on the black hole mass
B. Lanzoni (1), A. Mucciarelli (1), L. Origlia (2), M. Bellazzini (2),, F.R. Ferraro (1), E. Valenti (3), P. Miocchi (1), E. Dalessandro (1), C., Pallanca (1), D. Massari (1) - (1 DIFA, Univ. Bologna, 2 INAF-OA Bologna, 3, ESO, Munich)

TL;DR
This study used resolved-star spectroscopy to analyze the velocity dispersion profile of NGC 6388, finding no evidence of a central cusp and setting new upper limits on the black hole mass, challenging previous claims.
Contribution
The paper provides the first resolved-star velocity dispersion profile of NGC 6388, constraining the black hole mass to below 2000 solar masses and disputing earlier integrated light spectroscopy results.
Findings
Velocity dispersion is ~13 km/s at the center and flat out to 60".
No evidence of a central cusp in velocity dispersion profile.
Black hole mass constrained to less than ~2000 solar masses.
Abstract
By combining high spatial resolution and wide-field spectroscopy performed, respectively, with SINFONI and FLAMES at the ESO/VLT we measured the radial velocities of more than 600 stars in the direction of NGC 6388, a Galactic globular cluster which is suspected to host an intermediate-mass black hole. Approximately 55% of the observed targets turned out to be cluster members. The cluster velocity dispersion has been derived from the radial velocity of individual stars: 52 measurements in the innermost 2", and 276 stars located between 18" and 600". The velocity dispersion profile shows a central value of ~13 km/s, a flat behavior out to ~60" and a decreasing trend outwards. The comparison with spherical and isotropic models shows that the observed density and velocity dispersion profiles are inconsistent with the presence of a central black hole more massive than ~2000 Msol. These…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
