Logics to which the class of neat reducts is sensitive to
Tarek Sayed Ahmed

TL;DR
This paper investigates how the class of neat reducts in algebraic logic is affected by different logical languages, showing sensitivity to certain infinitary and finitary logics depending on the dimension.
Contribution
It demonstrates that the class of neat reducts is sensitive to quantifier-free infinitary logics in infinite dimensions, and to finitary logics in finite dimensions, revealing logical boundaries of algebraic classes.
Findings
Neat reducts are sensitive to quantifier-free infinitary logics in infinite dimensions.
In finite dimensions, neat reducts are sensitive without requiring infinite conjunctions.
The sensitivity indicates non-elementarity of the class of neat reducts in various logical contexts.
Abstract
Let L be a quantifier predicate logic. Let K be a class of algebras. We say that K is sensitive to L, if there is an algebra in K, that is L interpretable into an another algebra, and this latter algebra is elementary equivalent to an algebra not in K. (In particular, if L is L_{\omega,\omega}, this means that K is not elementary). We show that the class of neat reducts of every dimension is sensitive to quantifier free predicate logics with infinitary conjunctions; for finite dimensions, we do not need infinite conjunctions.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Algebra and Logic · Rings, Modules, and Algebras · semigroups and automata theory
