Stellar ages and convective cores in field main-sequence stars: first asteroseismic application to two Kepler targets
V. Silva Aguirre, S. Basu, I. M. Brand\~ao, J. Christensen-Dalsgaard,, S. Deheuvels, G. Do\u{g}an, T. S. Metcalfe, A. M. Serenelli, J. Ballot, W. J., Chaplin, M. S. Cunha, A. Weiss, T. Appourchaux, L. Casagrande, S. Cassisi, O., L. Creevey, R. A. Garcia, Y. Lebreton, A. Noels

TL;DR
This study demonstrates the first detection of a convective core in a Kepler main-sequence star using asteroseismology, highlighting the importance of frequency ratios for accurate stellar parameter estimation.
Contribution
It introduces a novel asteroseismic method to detect convective cores and emphasizes the reliability of frequency ratios over individual frequencies for stellar modeling.
Findings
First detection of a convective core in a Kepler star.
Frequency ratios provide more reliable stellar parameters.
Achieved 1.5% radius, 4% mass, and 10% age precision.
Abstract
Using asteroseismic data and stellar evolution models we make the first detection of a convective core in a Kepler field main-sequence star, putting a stringent constraint on the total size of the mixed zone and showing that extra mixing beyond the formal convective boundary exists. In a slightly less massive target the presence of a convective core cannot be conclusively discarded, and thus its remaining main-sequence life time is uncertain. Our results reveal that best-fit models found solely by matching individual frequencies of oscillations corrected for surface effects do not always properly reproduce frequency combinations. Moreover, slightly different criteria to define what the best-fit model is can lead to solutions with similar global properties but very different interior structures. We argue that the use of frequency ratios is a more reliable way to obtain accurate stellar…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
