A Measure-Free Approach to Conditioning
I. R. Goodman

TL;DR
This paper introduces a measure-free framework for conditioning using algebraic logic, extending probability logic with conditional objects to better interpret inference rules and facilitate evidence combination.
Contribution
It develops a new algebraic logic description pair with conditional objects, enabling rigorous probabilistic conditioning and evidence evaluation beyond traditional probability logic.
Findings
Constructed a new ALDP with conditional objects compatible with probabilistic conditioning.
Demonstrated feasible computation methods for evidence combination in a knowledge-based system.
Provided properties and calculus for the resulting Conditional Probability Logic.
Abstract
In an earlier paper, a new theory of measurefree "conditional" objects was presented. In this paper, emphasis is placed upon the motivation of the theory. The central part of this motivation is established through an example involving a knowledge-based system. In order to evaluate combination of evidence for this system, using observed data, auxiliary at tribute and diagnosis variables, and inference rules connecting them, one must first choose an appropriate algebraic logic description pair (ALDP): a formal language or syntax followed by a compatible logic or semantic evaluation (or model). Three common choices- for this highly non-unique choice - are briefly discussed, the logics being Classical Logic, Fuzzy Logic, and Probability Logic. In all three,the key operator representing implication for the inference rules is interpreted as the often-used disjunction of a negation (b => a) =…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSemantic Web and Ontologies · Rough Sets and Fuzzy Logic · Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
