Can Evidence Be Combined in the Dempster-Shafer Theory
John Yen

TL;DR
This paper introduces a new relational model for Dempster-Shafer theory that addresses Zadeh's conjecture on evidence noncombinability, demonstrating the continued applicability of Dempster's rule.
Contribution
The paper proposes an alternative relational model representing D-S masses as conditional granular distributions, challenging Zadeh's conjecture on evidence noncombinability.
Findings
Zadeh's conjecture does not hold in the new model
Dempster's rule remains applicable in the proposed model
Comparison shows the new model's advantages over Zadeh's relational model
Abstract
Dempster's rule of combination has been the most controversial part of the Dempster-Shafer (D-S) theory. In particular, Zadeh has reached a conjecture on the noncombinability of evidence from a relational model of the D-S theory. In this paper, we will describe another relational model where D-S masses are represented as conditional granular distributions. By comparing it with Zadeh's relational model, we will show how Zadeh's conjecture on combinability does not affect the applicability of Dempster's rule in our model.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBayesian Modeling and Causal Inference · Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping · Data Management and Algorithms
