On inferring extinction laws in z~6 quasars as signatures of supernova dust

TL;DR

This study critically examines the evidence for supernova-produced dust in z~6 quasars, finding that previous claims of a 3000 A extinction feature are weak and that dust properties are similar to lower-redshift environments.

Contribution

The paper provides a comprehensive re-analysis of high-redshift quasar extinction curves, challenging prior claims of supernova dust signatures and emphasizing the need for robust spectral analysis.

Findings

No strong evidence for the 3000 A extinction feature in re-analyzed spectra.

The median extinction curve resembles the Small Magellanic Cloud curve.

Existing evidence for supernova dust signatures at high redshift is weak.

Abstract

Unusual extinction curves of high-redshift QSOs have been taken as evidence that dust is primarily produced by supernovae at high redshift. In particular, the 3000 A Todini-Ferrara-Maiolino kink in the extinction curve of the z = 6.20 SDSS J1048+4637 has been attributed to supernova dust. Here we discuss the challenges in inferring robust extinction curves of high-redshift QSOs and critically assess previous claims of detection of supernova dust. In particular, we address the sensitivity to the choice of intrinsic QSO spectrum, the need for a long wavelength baseline, and the drawbacks in fitting theoretical extinction curves. In a sample of 21 QSOs at z ~ 6 we detect significant ultraviolet extinction using existing broad-band optical, near-infrared, and Spitzer photometry. The median extinction curve is consistent with a Small Magellanic Cloud curve with A_1450 ~ 0.7 mag and does not exhibit any conspicuous (restframe) 2175 A or 3000 A features. For two QSOs, SDSS J1044-0125 at z = 5.78 and SDSS J1030+0524 at z = 6.31, we further present X-shooter spectra covering the wavelength range 0.9-2.5 um. The resulting non-parametric extinction curves do not exhibit the 3000 A kink. Finally, in a re-analysis of literature spectra of SDSS J1048+4637, we do not find evidence for a conspicuous kink. We conclude that the existing evidence for a 3000 A feature is weak and that the overall dust properties at high and low redshift show no significant differences. This, however, does not preclude supernovae from dominating the dust budget at high redshift.