Resolution structure in HornSAT and CNFSAT
Koji Kobayashi

TL;DR
This paper explores the structural differences in resolution between HornSAT and CNFSAT, highlighting how HornSAT can be efficiently computed using clauses causality, unlike CNFSAT which relies on clauses correlation.
Contribution
It demonstrates that HornSAT can be computed via clauses causality with Log space reduction, whereas CNFSAT cannot, showing a fundamental complexity distinction.
Findings
HornSAT is computable by clauses causality using Log space reduction.
CNFSAT relies on clauses correlation and is not P-Complete.
Proof diagrams for HornSAT are computable within Log space, unlike CNFSAT.
Abstract
This article describes about the difference of resolution structure and size between HornSAT and CNFSAT. We can compute HornSAT by using clauses causality. Therefore we can compute proof diagram by using Log space reduction. But we must compute CNFSAT by using clauses correlation. Therefore we cannot compute proof diagram by using Log space reduction, and reduction of CNFSAT is not P-Complete.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Software Engineering Methodologies · Constraint Satisfaction and Optimization
