Parameter estimation for compact binary coalescence signals with the first generation gravitational-wave detector network
the LIGO Scientific Collaboration, the Virgo Collaboration: J. Aasi,, J. Abadie, B. P. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, M. Abernathy, T. Accadia,, F. Acernese, C. Adams, T. Adams, P. Addesso, R. Adhikari, C. Affeldt, M., Agathos, K. Agatsuma, P. Ajith, B. Allen, A. Allocca

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates the capability of current gravitational-wave detectors to accurately estimate parameters of simulated compact binary coalescence signals, including masses, spins, and locations, in preparation for advanced detector operations.
Contribution
It presents a comprehensive analysis of parameter estimation techniques applied to simulated signals in real detector data, including a blind injection, highlighting readiness for future advanced detector data.
Findings
Successful extraction of source parameters from simulated signals
Demonstrated ability to distinguish models despite data artifacts
Validated parameter estimation methods for a range of masses and spins
Abstract
Compact binary systems with neutron stars or black holes are one of the most promising sources for ground-based gravitational wave detectors. Gravitational radiation encodes rich information about source physics; thus parameter estimation and model selection are crucial analysis steps for any detection candidate events. Detailed models of the anticipated waveforms enable inference on several parameters, such as component masses, spins, sky location and distance that are essential for new astrophysical studies of these sources. However, accurate measurements of these parameters and discrimination of models describing the underlying physics are complicated by artifacts in the data, uncertainties in the waveform models and in the calibration of the detectors. Here we report such measurements on a selection of simulated signals added either in hardware or software to the data collected by…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
