Interview with Warren Wiscombe on scientific programing and his contributions to atmospheric science tool making
Piotr J. Flatau

TL;DR
This interview with Warren Wiscombe explores his influential work in atmospheric science, radiative transfer, and scientific programming, highlighting successful tools, software development, and the role of open source in scientific progress.
Contribution
It provides insights into Wiscombe's contributions to atmospheric modeling tools and discusses the evolution of scientific programming in climate science.
Findings
Successful software like MIEV and DISORT explained
Role of open source in scientific reproducibility discussed
Impact of radiative transfer parameterizations on climate models
Abstract
On March 11, 2013 I talked with Warren Wiscombe about his contributions to scientific computer programming, atmospheric science and radiative transfer. Our conversation is divided into three parts related to light scattering, radiative transfer and his general thoughts about scientific programming. There are some reflections on how radiative transfer parameterizations gradually sneaked in to modern climate and atmospheric Global Circulation Models. Why some software programs such as light scattering code MIEV and DISORT are very successful and why some of them fizzle. We talked about the role of tools in modern science, open source movement, repeatability of scientific results, computer languages, computer programs as objects of arts, and even if programs can be revolutionary.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMeteorological Phenomena and Simulations · Scientific Computing and Data Management
