The role of relativistic jets in the heaviest and most active supermassive black holes at high redshift
G. Ghisellini (1), F. Haardt (2,3), R. Della Ceca (1) M. Volonteri, (4), T. Sbarrato (1,2) ((1) INAF, Oss. di Brera, (2) Univ. Insubria (3) INFN,, MI-Bicocca, (4) IAP, Paris)

TL;DR
This paper discusses how relativistic jets are more common in the most massive black holes at high redshift, suggesting a link to black hole spin and accretion efficiency, with implications for black hole growth and evolution.
Contribution
It provides new observational evidence that relativistic jets are more prevalent in early universe supermassive black holes, highlighting the role of black hole spin and jet activity in their growth.
Findings
Relativistic jets are more frequent in massive black holes at high redshift.
The ratio of radio-loud to radio-quiet AGN varies strongly with redshift.
High spin and jet activity may inhibit rapid black hole growth.
Abstract
In powerful radio-quiet active galactic nuclei (AGN), black holes heavier than one billion solar masses form at a redshift ~1.5-2. Supermassive black holes in jetted radio-loud AGN seems to form earlier, at a redshift close to 4. The ratio of active radio-loud to radio-quiet AGN hosting heavy black holes is therefore a rather a strong function of redshift. We report on some recent evidence supporting this conclusion, gathered from the Burst Alert Telescope (BAT, onboard Swift) and by the Large Area Telescope (LAT, onboard Fermi). We suggest that the more frequent occurrence of relativistic jets in the most massive black holes at high redshifts, compared to later times, could be due to the average black hole spin being greater in the distant past, or else to the jet helping a fast accretion rate (or some combination of the two scenarios). We emphasize that the large total accretion…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
