A note on a Bayesian nonparametric estimator of the discovery probability
Annalisa Cerquetti

TL;DR
This paper corrects previous formulas for Bayesian nonparametric estimators of species discovery probabilities, providing accurate formulas using a new technique and verifying their correctness through explicit counterproofs.
Contribution
It offers corrected formulas for Bayesian nonparametric estimators under Gibbs and Poisson-Dirichlet priors, improving previous results with a novel derivation method.
Findings
Corrected formulas for Gibbs priors
Explicit formulas for Poisson-Dirichlet priors
Verification through counterproofs
Abstract
Favaro, Lijoi, and Pruenster (2012, Biometrics, 68, 1188--1196) derive a novel Bayesian nonparametric estimator of the probability of detecting at the th observation a species already observed with any given frequency in an enlarged sample of size , conditionally on a basic sample of size . Unfortunately the general result under Gibbs priors (Theorem 2), and consequently the explicit result under Poisson-Dirichlet priors (Proposition 3), appear to be wrong. Here we provide the correct formulas for both the results, obtained by means of a new technique devised in Cerquetti (2013). We verify the correctness of our derivation by an explicit counterproof for the two-parameter Poisson-Dirichlet case.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBayesian Methods and Mixture Models · Algorithms and Data Compression · Statistical Methods and Inference
