Reply to arXiv:1211.3957 and arXiv:1211.4731 by Leader et al. and arXiv:1212.0761 by Harindranath et al
Xiangdong Ji, Xiaonu Xiong, Feng Yuan
TL;DR
This paper defends previous findings on the transverse polarization parton sum rule against recent criticisms, asserting that the criticisms are invalid and reaffirming the original results.
Contribution
It provides a rebuttal to critiques of their earlier work, clarifying the validity of their transverse polarization parton sum rule results.
Findings
Criticisms about the sum rule are invalid
Original sum rule results are reaffirmed
No new empirical data presented
Abstract
We reply to the recent comments on our published papers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 (2012) 152005 and Phys. Lett. B717 (2012) 214. We point out that the criticisms about the transverse polarization parton sum rule we obtained are invalid.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies · Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions · High-Energy Particle Collisions Research