Galaxy Clusters around radio-loud AGN at 1.3 < z < 3.2 as seen by Spitzer
D. Wylezalek, A. Galametz, D. Stern, J. Vernet, C. De Breuck, N., Seymour, M. Brodwin, P. M. Eisenhardt, A. H. Gonzalez, N. Hatch, M. Jarvis,, A. Rettura, S. A. Stanford, J. A. Stevens

TL;DR
This study uses Spitzer data to identify galaxy clusters around radio-loud AGN at redshifts 1.3 to 3.2, demonstrating that most of these AGN are located in overdense environments, supporting their role as tracers of high-redshift proto-clusters.
Contribution
First statistical analysis showing that radio-loud AGN at high redshift are predominantly found in overdense environments, using IRAC color selection to identify associated galaxy clusters.
Findings
92% of radio-loud AGN are in denser-than-average environments
55% of fields are overdense at >2σ significance
Overdensity decreases with redshift, consistent with galaxy evolution
Abstract
We report the first results from the Clusters Around Radio-Loud AGN (CARLA) program, a Cycle 7 and 8 Spitzer Space Telescope snapshot program to investigate the environments of a large sample of obscured and unobscured luminous radio-loud AGN at 1.2 < z < 3.2. These data, obtained for 387 fields, reach 3.6 and 4.5 um depths of [3.6] (AB) = 22.6 and [4.5] (AB) = 22.9 at the 95% completeness level, which is two to three times fainter than L* in this redshift range. By using the color cut [3.6]-[4.5] > -0.1 (AB), which efficiently selects high-redshift (z > 1.3) galaxies of all types, we identify galaxy cluster member candidates in the fields of the radio-loud AGN. The local density of these IRAC-selected sources is compared to the density of similarly selected sources in blank fields. We find that 92% of the radio-loud AGN reside in environments richer than average. The majority (55%) of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
