Measuring Inaccuracy in Travel Demand Forecasting: Methodological Considerations Regarding Ramp Up and Sampling
Bent Flyvbjerg

TL;DR
This paper defends the use of forecast data at decision time and first-year traffic for measuring demand forecast inaccuracy, arguing that empirical evidence and practical considerations do not support ramp-up adjustments, and highlights potential biases in large-sample studies.
Contribution
It challenges common objections to measuring forecast inaccuracy using decision-time forecasts and first-year data, providing methodological insights and bias considerations.
Findings
Forecasts at decision time are appropriate for assessing decision reliability.
Ramp-up effects are not necessary to include in large-N studies.
Large samples tend to underestimate true forecast inaccuracy due to bias.
Abstract
Project promoters, forecasters, and managers sometimes object to two things in measuring inaccuracy in travel demand forecasting: (1) using the forecast made at the time of making the decision to build as the basis for measuring inaccuracy and (2) using traffic during the first year of operations as the basis for measurement. This paper presents the case against both objections. First, if one is interested in learning whether decisions about building transport infrastructure are based on reliable information, then it is exactly the traffic forecasted at the time of making the decision to build that is of interest. Second, although ideally studies should take into account so-called demand "ramp up" over a period of years, the empirical evidence and practical considerations do not support this ideal requirement, at least not for large-N studies. Finally, the paper argues that large…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
