Parameter tuning for a multi-fidelity dynamical model of the magnetosphere

TL;DR

This paper develops a sequential parameter tuning method for a multi-fidelity magnetosphere model, effectively reducing uncertainty and improving parameter estimates using large spatiotemporal data.

Contribution

It introduces a novel approach for inverse problems with multi-fidelity models and large data, utilizing sequential design and expected improvement to refine parameter estimates.

Findings

Sequential design reduces posterior uncertainty.

Method converges to true parameters in Lorenz `96 system.

Efficiently handles large spatiotemporal datasets.

Abstract

Geomagnetic storms play a critical role in space weather physics with the potential for far reaching economic impacts including power grid outages, air traffic rerouting, satellite damage and GPS disruption. The LFM-MIX is a state-of-the-art coupled magnetospheric-ionospheric model capable of simulating geomagnetic storms. Imbedded in this model are physical equations for turning the magnetohydrodynamic state parameters into energy and flux of electrons entering the ionosphere, involving a set of input parameters. The exact values of these input parameters in the model are unknown, and we seek to quantify the uncertainty about these parameters when model output is compared to observations. The model is available at different fidelities: a lower fidelity which is faster to run, and a higher fidelity but more computationally intense version. Model output and observational data are large spatiotemporal systems; the traditional design and analysis of computer experiments is unable to cope with such large data sets that involve multiple fidelities of model output. We develop an approach to this inverse problem for large spatiotemporal data sets that incorporates two different versions of the physical model. After an initial design, we propose a sequential design based on expected improvement. For the LFM-MIX, the additional run suggested by expected improvement diminishes posterior uncertainty by ruling out a posterior mode and shrinking the width of the posterior distribution. We also illustrate our approach using the Lorenz `96 system of equations for a simplified atmosphere, using known input parameters. For the Lorenz `96 system, after performing sequential runs based on expected improvement, the posterior mode converges to the true value and the posterior variability is reduced.