Gamma-ray burst optical light-curve zoo: comparison with X-ray observations
Elena Zaninoni, Maria Grazia Bernardini, Raffaella Margutti, Samantha, Oates, and Guido Chincarini

TL;DR
This study analyzes optical and X-ray light curves of gamma-ray burst afterglows to understand their relationship, spectral evolution, and the connection between prompt emission features and afterglow behaviors.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive comparison of optical and X-ray afterglow properties, revealing correlations and differences, and discusses the implications for GRB emission models.
Findings
Optical and X-ray spectra soften over time.
Gas-to-dust ratios are higher than in the Milky Way.
Optical and X-ray afterglows often show different temporal behaviors.
Abstract
We present a comprehensive analysis of the optical and X-ray light curves (LCs) and spectral energy distributions (SEDs) of a large sample of gamma-ray burst (GRB) afterglows to investigate the relationship between the optical and X-ray emission after the prompt phase. We collected the optical data from the literature and determined the shapes of the optical LCs. Then, using previously presented X-ray data we modeled the optical/X-ray SEDs. We studied the SED parameter distributions and compared the optical and X-ray LC slopes and shapes. The optical and X-ray spectra become softer as a function of time while the gas-to-dust ratios of GRBs are higher than the values calculated for the Milky Way and the Large and Magellanic Clouds. For 20% of the GRBs the difference between the optical and X-ray slopes is consistent with 0 or 1=4 within the uncertainties (we did it not consider the steep…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
