Post-Sphaleron Baryogenesis and an Upper Limit on the Neutron-Antineutron Oscillation Time
K.S. Babu, P.S. Bhupal Dev, Elaine C.F.S. Fortes, R.N. Mohapatra

TL;DR
This paper discusses a baryogenesis model called post--sphaleron baryogenesis within a quark--lepton unified framework, predicting observable neutron--antineutron oscillations and establishing an upper limit on the oscillation time based on experimental constraints.
Contribution
It introduces a post--sphaleron baryogenesis scenario in a TeV-scale gauge symmetry model, linking baryon asymmetry, neutrino masses, and neutron--antineutron oscillations with experimental testability.
Findings
Upper limit on neutron--antineutron oscillation time is 5 x 10^{10} seconds.
Predicted oscillation time could be less than 10^{10} seconds for low unification scales.
Model naturally incorporates neutrino masses and predicts TeV-scale scalars accessible at LHC.
Abstract
A recently proposed scenario for baryogenesis, called post--sphaleron baryogenesis (PSB) is discussed within a class of quark--lepton unified framework based on the gauge symmetry SU(2)_L x SU(2)_R x SU(4)_c realized in the multi--TeV scale. The baryon asymmetry of the universe in this model is produced below the electroweak phase transition temperature after the sphalerons have decoupled from the Hubble expansion. These models embed naturally the seesaw mechanism for neutrino masses, and predict color-sextet scalar particles in the TeV range which may be accessible to the LHC experiments. A necessary consequence of this scenario is the baryon number violating \Delta B=2 process of neutron--antineutron (n-\bar{n}) oscillations. In this paper we show that the constraints of PSB, when combined with the neutrino oscillation data and restrictions from flavor changing neutral currents…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
