Criticisms of modelling packet traffic using long-range dependence (extended version)
R. G. Clegg, R. Landa, M. Rio

TL;DR
This paper critically examines the role of long-range dependence in Internet traffic modeling, revealing theoretical flaws in common models and showing that long-range correlations are generally not crucial for queuing performance.
Contribution
It challenges the significance of long-range dependence in Internet traffic and exposes flaws in models that assume its importance for queuing behavior.
Findings
Long-range dependence models have theoretical flaws.
Long-range correlations are not critical for queuing performance.
High load conditions may be affected by long-range correlations.
Abstract
This paper criticises the notion that long-range dependence is an important contributor to the queuing behaviour of real Internet traffic. The idea is questioned in two different ways. Firstly, a class of models used to simulate Internet traffic is shown to have important theoretical flaws. It is shown that this behaviour is inconsistent with the behaviour of real traffic traces. Secondly, the notion that long-range correlations significantly affects the queuing performance of traffic is investigated by destroying those correlations in real traffic traces (by reordering). It is shown that the longer ranges of correlations are not important except in one case with an extremely high load.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
