Reliability test for the experimental results of electric quadrupole hyperfine structure constants and new assessment of nuclear quadrupole moments in $^{135,137}$Ba
B. K. Sahoo, M. D. Barrett, B. P. Das

TL;DR
This study assesses the reliability of experimental hyperfine structure constants in barium isotopes, identifies inconsistencies, and provides revised nuclear quadrupole moment values using advanced relativistic many-body calculations.
Contribution
It introduces a comprehensive reliability test for experimental hyperfine constants and offers new nuclear quadrupole moment estimates based on relativistic coupled-cluster theory.
Findings
Inconsistencies found in experimental $B$ values across different studies.
Revised nuclear quadrupole moments for $^{135}$Ba and $^{137}$Ba differ by about 4% from previous values.
Confidence tests highlight the need for careful validation of hyperfine structure measurements.
Abstract
We investigate electric quadrupole hyperfine structure constant () results in Ba and Ba and compare their ratios with the reported measurements of the ratio between the nuclear quadrupole moment () values of these isotopes. We carry out confidence tests for the reported experimental values and calculations of from the present work. Inconsistencies in the experimental values are observed in both the isotopes from different experiments performed using the same techniques. The present calculations are carried out using an all order relativistic many-body theory considering only single and double excitations in the coupled-cluster ansatz. After a detailed analysis of the results, the values of we obtain for Ba and Ba are 0.153(2) and 0.236(3), respectively, which differ by about 4% from the currently referred precise…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
