XTE J1752-223 in outburst: a persistent radio jet, dramatic flaring, multiple ejections and linear polarisation
Catherine Brocksopp, Stephane Corbel, Tasso Tzioumis, Jess Broderick,, Jerome Rodriguez, Jun Yang, Rob Fender, Zsolt Paragi

TL;DR
This study presents a detailed radio and X-ray analysis of the black hole candidate XTE J1752-223 during its 2009 outburst, revealing persistent jets, multiple ejections, and complex flaring behavior with implications for jet physics.
Contribution
It provides the first comprehensive radio monitoring over the entire outburst, identifying multiple ejections, superluminal motion, and interactions with the environment, advancing understanding of jet mechanisms in black hole transients.
Findings
Persistent radio jet during the entire hard state
At least 7 radio flares with similar energy requirements
Evidence of superluminal ejecta and jet-environment interactions
Abstract
The black hole candidate, XTE J1752-223, was discovered in 2009 October when it entered an outburst. We obtained radio data from the Australia Telescope Compact Array for the duration of the ~9 month event. The lightcurves show that the radio emission from the compact jet persisted for the duration of an extended hard state and through the transition to the intermediate state. The flux then rose rapidly by a factor of 10 and the radio source entered a series of at least 7 maxima, the first of which was likely to be emission associated with the compact jet. The subsequent 6 flares were accompanied by variable behaviour in terms of radio spectrum, degree of linear polarisation, morphology and associated X-ray behaviour. They were, however, remarkably similar in terms of the estimated minimum power required to launch such an ejection event. We compare the timing of radio peaks with the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
