Dust-Obscured Galaxies in the Local Universe
Ho Seong Hwang, Margaret J. Geller (Smithsonian Astrophysical, Observatory)

TL;DR
This study identifies and characterizes 47 local dust-obscured galaxies (DOGs) using infrared and ultraviolet data, revealing their similarities to high-redshift DOGs and suggesting diverse physical mechanisms behind dust obscuration.
Contribution
The paper presents the first detailed analysis of local DOGs, comparing their properties to high-z counterparts, and highlights their diverse morphologies and physical origins.
Findings
Local DOGs have similar properties to high-z DOGs despite lower IR luminosities.
Many local DOGs show no signs of recent interactions or companions.
Physical mechanisms behind dust obscuration are diverse, not indicating a single evolutionary phase.
Abstract
We use Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE), AKARI, and Galaxy Evolution Explorer (GALEX) data to select local analogs of high-redshift (z~2) dust obscured galaxies (DOGs). We identify 47 local DOGs with S_{12\mu m}/S_{0.22 \mu m}>892 and S_{12\mu m}>20 mJy at 0.05<z<0.08 in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey data release 7. The infrared luminosities of these DOGs are in the range 3.4x10^{10} (L_\odot)<L_{IR}<7.0x10^{11} (L_\odot) with a median L_{IR} of 2.1x10^{11} (L_\odot). We compare the physical properties of local DOGs with a control sample of galaxies that have lower but have similar redshift, IR luminosity, and stellar mass distributions. Both WISE 12 micron and GALEX near-ultraviolet (NUV) flux densities of DOGs differ from the control sample of galaxies, but the difference is much larger in the NUV. Among the 47 DOGs, 36\pm7% have small axis ratios…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
