On the Statistical Significance of the Bulk Flow Measured by the PLANCK Satellite
F. Atrio-Barandela

TL;DR
This paper re-evaluates the statistical significance of the bulk flow detected by Planck, showing that previous error estimates were inflated, and confirms the flow's significance aligns with earlier WMAP findings.
Contribution
It identifies systematic overestimation of uncertainties in Planck's bulk flow analysis and corrects the error assessment, reconciling Planck's results with WMAP.
Findings
Corrected errors show the bulk flow is statistically significant.
The significance of the bulk flow is consistent with WMAP results.
Systematic overestimation of uncertainties affects previous conclusions.
Abstract
A recent analysis of data collected by the Planck satellite detected a net dipole at the location of X-ray selected galaxy clusters, corresponding to a large-scale bulk flow extending at least to , the median redshift of the cluster sample. The amplitude of this flow, as measured with Planck, is consistent with earlier findings based on data from the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP). However, the uncertainty assigned to the dipole by the Planck team is much larger than that found in the WMAP studies, leading the authors of the Planck study to conclude that the observed bulk flow is not statistically significant. We here show that two of the three implementations of random sampling used in the error analysis of the Planck study lead to systematic overestimates in the uncertainty of the measured dipole. Random simulations of the sky do not take into account that the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
