Imprints of feedback in young gasless clusters?
Richard J. Parker (1), James E. Dale (2) ((1) ETH Zurich,, Switzerland, (2) Excellence Cluster, Garching, Germany)

TL;DR
This study uses N-body simulations to compare the long-term dynamical evolution of young star clusters formed with and without feedback, finding that initial density and virial state influence the retention of substructure.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed comparison of cluster evolution with and without feedback effects based on initial conditions from hydrodynamical simulations.
Findings
Clusters formed without feedback lose substructure over 10 Myr.
Clusters formed with feedback often retain initial substructure.
Initial density and virial state influence substructure retention.
Abstract
We present the results of N-body simulations in which we take the masses, positions and velocities of sink particles from five pairs of hydrodynamical simulations of star formation by Dale et al. (2012, 2013) and evolve them for a further 10Myr. We compare the dynamical evolution of star clusters that formed under the influence of mass-loss driven by photoionization feedback, to the evolution of clusters that formed without feedback. We remove any remaining gas and follow the evolution of structure in the clusters (measured by the Q-parameter), half-mass radius, central density, surface density and the fraction of bound stars. There is little discernible difference in the evolution of clusters that formed with feedback compared to those that formed without. The only clear trend is that all clusters which form without feedback in the hydrodynamical simulations lose any initial structure…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
