
TL;DR
This review summarizes recent findings on high-energy cosmic ray electrons and positrons, discussing anomalies, their possible origins, and emphasizing the need for high-resolution data to distinguish between models like pulsars and dark matter.
Contribution
It provides a systematic analysis of cosmic ray electron anomalies, compares models for their origin, and highlights the importance of high-resolution measurements for model discrimination.
Findings
Anomalies in electron and positron spectra observed in recent experiments.
High-resolution data may distinguish pulsar from dark matter origins.
Current data is insufficient to conclusively identify the source of anomalies.
Abstract
This review concentrates on the results obtained, over the last ten years, on the astrophysics of high-energy cosmic ray electrons and positrons. The anomalies, observed in the data of recent experiments (possible bump in the electron spectrum and the PAMELA anomaly in the positron fraction) are discussed through the systematic use of simple analytical solutions of the transport equations for cosmic ray electrons. Three main ways of explaining the origin of the anomalies are considered: the conservative way supposing the positrons to be pure secondary particles; the nearby sources like pulsars origin; and the dark matter origin. This review discusses, also, the inability to select the pulsars model or the dark matter model to explain the electron anomalies on the basis of the electron spectra with the usual large energy binning (). It is argued that the signature of nearby…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
