
TL;DR
This paper introduces two novel structures for organizing bodies of evidence, significantly reducing computational complexity in evidence theory operations without generating all subsets.
Contribution
It proposes a partition-based structure and hierarchical trees to simplify belief function calculations and Dempster's rule, improving efficiency in evidence theory.
Findings
Partitioning by cardinality reduces calculation complexity.
Hierarchical trees further optimize belief and combination computations.
Both methods avoid exhaustive subset generation.
Abstract
In this article we present two ways of structuring bodies of evidence, which allow us to reduce the complexity of the operations usually performed in the framework of evidence theory. The first structure just partitions the focal elements in a body of evidence by their cardinality. With this structure we are able to reduce the complexity on the calculation of the belief functions Bel, Pl, and Q. The other structure proposed here, the Hierarchical Trees, permits us to reduce the complexity of the calculation of Bel, Pl, and Q, as well as of the Dempster's rule of combination in relation to the brute-force algorithm. Both these structures do not require the generation of all the subsets of the reference domain.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBayesian Modeling and Causal Inference · AI-based Problem Solving and Planning · Rough Sets and Fuzzy Logic
