Symbolic Decision Theory and Autonomous Systems

TL;DR

This paper discusses a symbolic decision theory framework for autonomous systems, emphasizing reasoning under uncertainty, argumentation, and reflection to improve decision support and autonomous decision making.

Contribution

It introduces an extended inference method called argumentation for symbolic decision procedures and explores theoretical foundations for autonomous decision making.

Findings

Successful application in decision support systems

Development of argumentation-based reasoning methods

Addressing reflection in autonomous decision agents

Abstract

The ability to reason under uncertainty and with incomplete information is a fundamental requirement of decision support technology. In this paper we argue that the concentration on theoretical techniques for the evaluation and selection of decision options has distracted attention from many of the wider issues in decision making. Although numerical methods of reasoning under uncertainty have strong theoretical foundations, they are representationally weak and only deal with a small part of the decision process. Knowledge based systems, on the other hand, offer greater flexibility but have not been accompanied by a clear decision theory. We describe here work which is under way towards providing a theoretical framework for symbolic decision procedures. A central proposal is an extended form of inference which we call argumentation; reasoning for and against decision options from generalised domain theories. The approach has been successfully used in several decision support applications, but it is argued that a comprehensive decision theory must cover autonomous decision making, where the agent can formulate questions as well as take decisions. A major theoretical challenge for this theory is to capture the idea of reflection to permit decision agents to reason about their goals, what they believe and why, and what they need to know or do in order to achieve their goals.