The strongest bounds on active-sterile neutrino mixing after Planck data
Alessandro Mirizzi (II Inst. Theor. Phys., Hamburg Uni.), Gianpiero, Mangano (INFN Naples), Ninetta Saviano (II Inst. Theor. Phys., Hamburg Uni.,, Naples Uni. & INFN Naples), Enrico Borriello (II Inst. Theor. Phys., Hamburg, Uni.), Carlo Giunti (INFN Torino)

TL;DR
This paper updates cosmological bounds on light sterile neutrino properties using Planck data, revealing tighter constraints than laboratory experiments and highlighting tensions with short-baseline neutrino hints.
Contribution
It provides the first comprehensive cosmological bounds on (3+1) sterile neutrino models considering two active-sterile mixing angles and both mass orderings.
Findings
Bounds are more stringent than laboratory constraints.
Significant tension exists between cosmological bounds and short-baseline hints.
Modifications to standard cosmology are needed to reconcile discrepancies.
Abstract
Light sterile neutrinos can be excited by oscillations with active neutrinos in the early universe. Their properties can be constrained by their contribution as extra-radiation, parameterized in terms of the effective number of neutrino species N_ eff, and to the universe energy density today \Omega_\nu h^2. Both these parameters have been measured to quite a good precision by the Planck satellite experiment. We use this result to update the bounds on the parameter space of (3+1) sterile neutrino scenarios, with an active-sterile neutrino mass squared splitting in the range (10^{-5} - 10^2 ) eV^2. We consider both normal and inverted mass orderings for the active and sterile states. For the first time we take into account the possibility of two non-vanishing active-sterile mixing angles. We find that the bounds are more stringent than those obtained in laboratory experiments. This leads…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
