Planck 2013 results. XXV. Searches for cosmic strings and other topological defects
Planck Collaboration: P. A. R. Ade, N. Aghanim, C. Armitage-Caplan, M., Arnaud, M. Ashdown, F. Atrio-Barandela, J. Aumont, C. Baccigalupi, A. J., Banday, R. B. Barreiro, J. G. Bartlett, N. Bartolo, E. Battaner, R. Battye,, K. Benabed, A. Beno\^it, A. Benoit-L\'evy, J.-P. Bernard

TL;DR
This paper uses Planck data to set new constraints on cosmic strings and topological defects, combining power spectrum analysis and non-Gaussian signatures to improve bounds on string tension and defect contributions.
Contribution
It provides the first comprehensive constraints on cosmic strings from Planck data, including power spectrum and non-Gaussian analyses, covering various string models and defect types.
Findings
String tension constraints: Gμ/c² < 1.5×10⁻⁷ for Nambu-Goto strings.
Upper limits on defect contributions: f₁₀ < 0.015 for Nambu-Goto strings.
Non-Gaussian bounds: Gμ/c² < 8.8×10⁻⁷ from bispectrum analysis.
Abstract
Planck data have been used to provide stringent new constraints on cosmic strings and other defects. We describe forecasts of the CMB power spectrum induced by cosmic strings, calculating these from network models and simulations using line-of-sight Boltzmann solvers. We have studied Nambu-Goto cosmic strings, as well as field theory strings for which radiative effects are important, thus spanning the range of theoretical uncertainty in strings models. We have added the angular power spectrum from strings to that for a simple adiabatic model, with the extra fraction defined as at multipole . This parameter has been added to the standard six parameter fit using COSMOMC with flat priors. For the Nambu-Goto string model, we have obtained a constraint on the string tension of and at 95% confidence that can be improved to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
