Planck 2013 results. XVI. Cosmological parameters
Planck Collaboration: P. A. R. Ade, N. Aghanim, C. Armitage-Caplan, M., Arnaud, M. Ashdown, F. Atrio-Barandela, J. Aumont, C. Baccigalupi, A. J., Banday, R. B. Barreiro, J. G. Bartlett, E. Battaner, K. Benabed, A. Beno\^it,, A. Benoit-L\'evy, J.-P. Bernard, M. Bersanelli

TL;DR
The Planck 2013 results strongly support the standard flat LCDM cosmology with high-precision parameter estimates, but reveal some anomalies at low multipoles and no evidence for new physics beyond the standard model.
Contribution
This paper provides the first high-precision cosmological parameter constraints from Planck CMB measurements, confirming the standard model and exploring extensions with no significant deviations.
Findings
Precise measurements of cosmological parameters, e.g., H0=67.3 km/s/Mpc
No significant evidence for additional neutrino species or dark energy dynamics
An anomaly at low multipoles in the CMB power spectrum
Abstract
We present the first results based on Planck measurements of the CMB temperature and lensing-potential power spectra. The Planck spectra at high multipoles are extremely well described by the standard spatially-flat six-parameter LCDM cosmology. In this model Planck data determine the cosmological parameters to high precision. We find a low value of the Hubble constant, H0=67.3+/-1.2 km/s/Mpc and a high value of the matter density parameter, Omega_m=0.315+/-0.017 (+/-1 sigma errors) in excellent agreement with constraints from baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) surveys. Including curvature, we find that the Universe is consistent with spatial flatness to percent-level precision using Planck CMB data alone. We present results from an analysis of extensions to the standard cosmology, using astrophysical data sets in addition to Planck and high-resolution CMB data. None of these models are…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
