Planck 2013 results. IX. HFI spectral response
Planck Collaboration: P. A. R. Ade, N. Aghanim, C. Armitage-Caplan, M., Arnaud, M. Ashdown, F. Atrio-Barandela, J. Aumont, C. Baccigalupi, A. J., Banday, R. B. Barreiro, E. Battaner, K. Benabed, A. Beno\^it, A., Benoit-L\'evy, J.-P. Bernard, M. Bersanelli, P. Bielewicz, J. Bobin

TL;DR
The paper details the ground-based spectral response measurements of the Planck HFI instrument, crucial for accurate data analysis and calibration, validated through comparisons with in-flight observations and emission data.
Contribution
It provides the definitive ground-based spectral response data for the Planck HFI, essential for precise component separation and calibration in cosmological analyses.
Findings
Spectral response data verified against in-flight measurements.
Out-of-band rejection better than 10^8 demonstrated.
Good agreement between ground tests and flight data within uncertainties.
Abstract
The Planck High Frequency Instrument (HFI) spectral response was determined through a series of ground based tests conducted with the HFI focal plane in a cryogenic environment prior to launch. The main goal of the spectral transmission tests was to measure the relative spectral response (including out-of-band signal rejection) of all HFI detectors. This was determined by measuring the output of a continuously scanned Fourier transform spectrometer coupled with all HFI detectors. As there is no on-board spectrometer within HFI, the ground-based spectral response experiments provide the definitive data set for the relative spectral calibration of the HFI. The spectral response of the HFI is used in Planck data analysis and component separation, this includes extraction of CO emission observed within Planck bands, dust emission, Sunyaev-Zeldovich sources, and intensity to polarization…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
