Warm Spitzer Occultation Photometry of WASP-26b at 3.6{\mu}m and 4.5{\mu}m
D.P. Mahtani, P.F.L. Maxted, D.R. Anderson, A.M.S. Smith, B. Smalley,, J. Tregloan-Reed, J. Southworth, N. Madhusudhan, A. Collier Cameron, M., Gillon, J. Harrington, C. Hellier, D. Pollacco, D. Queloz, A.H.M.J. Triaud,, R.G. West

TL;DR
This study reports the first detection of WASP-26b's occultation at 3.6 and 4.5 micrometers using warm Spitzer, analyzing its atmospheric properties and orbit, and discusses implications for thermal inversions.
Contribution
First detection of WASP-26b occultation at infrared wavelengths and analysis of its atmospheric temperature and orbital eccentricity.
Findings
Occultation depths at 3.6μm and 4.5μm are 0.00126 and 0.00149.
Brightness temperatures are approximately 1825K and 1725K.
Orbit is consistent with being circular, with e < 0.04.
Abstract
We present new warm Spitzer occultation photometry of WASP-26 at 3.6{\mu}m and 4.5{\mu}m along with new transit photometry taken in the g,r and i bands. We report the first detection of the occultation of WASP-26b, with occultation depths at 3.6{\mu}m and 4.5{\mu}m of 0.00126 +/- 0.00013 and 0.00149 +/- 0.00016 corresponding to brightness temperatures of 1825+/-80K and 1725+/-89K, respectively. We find that the eccentricity of the orbit is consistent with a circular orbit at the 1{\sigma} level with a 3{\sigma} upper limit of e < 0.04. According to the activity-inversion relation of Knutson et al. (2010), WASP-26b is predicted to host a thermal inversion. The brightness temperatures deduced from the eclipse depths are consistent with an isothermal atmosphere, although it is within the uncertainties that the planet may host a weak thermal inversion. The data are equally well fit by…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
