The role of major mergers in shaping galaxies at 2<z<4 in the VUDS and VVDS surveys
L. A. M. Tasca, O. Le Fevre, C. Lopez-Sanjuan, P.-W. Wang, P. Cassata,, B. Garilli, O. Ilbert, V. Le Brun, B. C. Lemaux, D. Maccagni, L. Tresse, S., Bardelli, T. Contini, O. Cucciati, A. Fontana, M. Giavalisco, J.-P. Kneib, M., Salvato, Y. Taniguchi, D. Vergani, G. Zamorani

TL;DR
This study identifies close galaxy pairs at redshifts 2-4 to evaluate the role of major mergers in early galaxy mass assembly, finding that such mergers are common and significantly contribute to galaxy growth during this epoch.
Contribution
First spectroscopic identification and analysis of close galaxy pairs at 2<z<4, estimating merger fractions and their impact on galaxy evolution in early universe.
Findings
Merger fraction at 2<z<4 is approximately 15-20%.
Pairs are likely to merge within 1 Gyr.
Mergers increase galaxy mass by about 60%.
Abstract
The mass assembly of galaxies can proceed through different physical processes. Here we report on the spectroscopic identification of close physical pairs of galaxies at redshifts 2 <z < 4 and discuss the impact of major mergers in shaping galaxies at these early cosmological times. We aim to identify and characterize close physical pairs of galaxies destined to merge and use their properties to infer the contribution of merging processes to the early mass assembly of galaxies. We search for galaxy pairs with a transverse separation r_p < 25 h^{-1} kpc and a velocity difference Delta v < 500 km s^{-1} using the VIMOS VLT Deep Survey (VVDS) and early data from the VIMOS Ultra Deep Survey (VUDS) that comprise a sample of 1111 galaxies with spectroscopic redshifts measurements at redshifts 1.8 < z < 4 in the COSMOS, ECDFS, and VVDS-02h fields. We analyse their spectra and associated…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
