Criteria for Hankel operators to be sign-definite
D. R. Yafaev

TL;DR
This paper establishes criteria for when self-adjoint Hankel operators are sign-definite by relating their spectra to a sign-function, providing explicit formulas and spectral multiplicity results.
Contribution
It introduces explicit criteria linking the spectra of Hankel operators to a sign-function, including formulas and multiplicity results, applicable to various classes.
Findings
Negative and positive spectra multiplicities coincide
Sign-definiteness characterized by the sign of the function s(x)
Explicit formulas for kernels and spectral multiplicities
Abstract
We show that total multiplicities of negative and positive spectra of a self-adjoint Hankel operator with kernel and of an operator of multiplication by some real function coincide. In particular, if and only if . The kernel and its "sign-function" are related by an explicit formula. An expression of in terms of leads to an exponential representation of . Our approach directly applies to various classes of Hankel operators. In particular, for Hankel operators of finite rank, we find an explicit formula for the total multiplicity of their negative and positive spectra.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
