The Pan-STARRS 1 Photometric Reference Ladder, Release 12.0
E. A. Magnier, E. Schlafly, D. Finkbeiner, M. Juric, J. L. Tonry, W., S. Burgett, K. C. Chambers, H. A. Flewelling, N. Kaiser, R.-P. Kudritzki, J., S. Morgan, P. A. Price, W. E. Sweeney, C. W. Stubbs

TL;DR
The paper presents the first public release of the Pan-STARRS 1 Photometric Ladder, providing calibrated photometry data across a large sky area, with systematic uncertainties around 8-13 millimags, as part of ongoing survey data releases.
Contribution
This work introduces the initial public release of the PS1 Photometric Ladder, a comprehensive calibrated photometric dataset covering a significant portion of the sky from the Pan-STARRS 1 survey.
Findings
Photometry for approximately 1000 objects per square degree.
Saturation limits around magnitude 13-13.5 depending on filter.
Systematic uncertainties of 7-13 millimags in calibration.
Abstract
As of 2012 Jan 21, the Pan-STARRS 1 3\pi Survey has observed the 3/4 of the sky visible from Hawaii with a minimum of 2 and mean of 7.6 observations in 5 filters, g_p1, r_p1, i_p1, z_p1, y_p1. Now at the end of the second year of the mission, we are in a position to make an initial public release of a portion of this unprecedented dataset. This article describes the PS1 Photometric Ladder, Release 12.01 This is the first of a series of data releases to be generated as the survey coverage increases and the data analysis improves. The Photometric Ladder has rungs every hour in RA and at 4 intervals in declination. We will release updates with increased area coverage (more rungs) from the latest dataset until the PS1 survey and the final re-reduction are completed. The currently released catalog presents photometry of \approx 1000 objects per square degree in the rungs of the ladder.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
