Improving the precision of time-delay cosmography with observations of galaxies along the line of sight
Zach S. Greene, Sherry H. Suyu, Tommaso Treu, Stefan Hilbert, Matthew, W. Auger, Thomas E. Collett, Philip J. Marshall, Christopher D. Fassnacht,, Roger D. Blandford, Marua Bradac, L\'eon V.E. Koopmans

TL;DR
This paper presents a method to improve cosmological measurements from gravitational lensing by constraining line-of-sight mass effects using galaxy observations and simulations, reducing uncertainties significantly.
Contribution
The authors develop a new approach to constrain line-of-sight convergence using galaxy overdensity matching with mock catalogs, enhancing the precision of time-delay cosmography.
Findings
Uncertainty in line-of-sight convergence is reduced from 0.06 to 0.04 for overdense lines of sight.
For typical lines of sight, uncertainty is lowered to below 0.03, corresponding to less than 3% distance error.
Photometric redshifts from griK bands are nearly as effective as spectroscopic redshifts for constraining line-of-sight effects.
Abstract
In order to use strong gravitational lens time delays to measure precise and accurate cosmological parameters the effects of mass along the line of sight must be taken into account. We present a method to achieve this by constraining the probability distribution function of the effective line of sight convergence k_ext. The method is based on matching the observed overdensity in the weighted number of galaxies to that found in mock catalogs with k_ext obtained by ray-tracing through structure formation simulations. We explore weighting schemes based on projected distance, mass, luminosity, and redshift. This additional information reduces the uncertainty of k_ext from sigma_k $0.06 to ~0.04 for very overdense lines of sight like that of the system B1608+656. For more common lines of sight, sigma_k is reduced to ~<0.03, corresponding to an uncertainty of ~<3% on distance. This…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
