CH, V=L, Disintegrations of Measures, and {\Pi}^1_1 Sets
Karl Backs, Steve Jackson, and R. Daniel Mauldin

TL;DR
This paper explores the set-theoretic independence of Maharam's question on measure disintegrations, showing that the answer varies with different axioms like CH and V=L, and constructs special a1^1_1 sets.
Contribution
It demonstrates the independence of Maharam's question from ZFC and constructs a1^1_1 sets with unique properties under certain axioms.
Findings
Under CH, the answer to Maharam's question is no.
Under V=L, a1^1_1 sets with special properties can be constructed.
The results connect measure theory with infinitary combinatorics and set-theoretic axioms.
Abstract
In 1950 Maharam asked whether every disintegration of a -finite measure into -finite measures is necessarily uniformly -finite. Over the years under special conditions on the disintegration, the answer was shown to be yes. However, we show here that the answer may depend on the axioms of set theory in the following sense. If CH, the continuum hypothesis holds, then the answer is no. One proof of this leads to some interesting problems in infinitary combinatorics. If G\"odel's axiom of constructibility holds, then not only is the answer no, but, of equal interest is the construction of sets with very special properties.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
Topicsadvanced mathematical theories · Mathematical Approximation and Integration
