The height evolution of the `true' CME mass derived from STEREO COR1 and COR2 observations
B.M. Bein, M. Temmer, A. Vourlidas, A.M. Veronig, D. Utz

TL;DR
This study analyzes the height evolution of the true mass of CMEs using combined STEREO observations, developing a model that accounts for observational effects and actual mass increase, providing insights into CME energetics and forces.
Contribution
The paper introduces a fitting function to describe CME mass evolution with height, considering both observational effects and real mass increase, enabling more accurate mass and energy estimations.
Findings
CME mass increases by 2-6% per Rs, mainly between 10Rs and 20Rs.
Estimated CME kinetic energies range from 1 to 66 x 10^23 Joules.
Propelling forces on CMEs vary between 2.2 and 510 x 10^14 N.
Abstract
Using combined STEREO-A and STEREO-B EUVI, COR1 and COR2 data, we derive deprojected CME kinematics and CME `true' mass evolutions for a sample of 25 events that occurred during December 2007 to April 2011. We develop a fitting function to describe the CME mass evolution with height. The function considers both the effect of the coronagraph occulter, at the beginning of the CME evolution, and an actual mass increase. The latter becomes important at about 10Rs to 15Rs and is assumed to mostly contribute up to 20Rs. The mass increase ranges from 2% to 6% per Rs and, is positively correlated to the total CME mass. Due to the combination of COR1 and COR2 mass measurements, we are able to estimate the `true' mass value for very low coronal heights (< 3Rs). Based on the deprojected CME kinematics and initial ejected masses, we derive the kinetic energies and propelling forces acting on the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
