Universal Cycles of Complementary Classes
Michelle Champlin, Anant Godbole, and Beverly Tomlinson

TL;DR
This paper extends the concept of universal cycles to complementary classes of combinatorial objects, demonstrating their existence for various complex and constrained classes such as alternating words, non-injective functions, and illegal tournament rankings.
Contribution
It introduces the existence of universal cycles for new classes of objects, including class-alternating words and non-injective functions, expanding the scope of U-cycle theory.
Findings
Existence of U-cycles for class-alternating words
Existence of U-cycles for words with repeated letters
Existence of U-cycles for non-onto functions
Abstract
Universal Cycles, or U-cycles, as originally defined by de Bruijn, are an efficient method to exhibit a large class of combinatorial objects in a compressed fashion, and with no repeats. de Bruijn's theorem states that U-cycles for letter words on a letter alphabet exist for all and . Much has already been proved about Universal Cycles for a variety of other objects. This work is intended to augment the current research in the area by exhibiting U-cycles for {\it complementary classes}. Results will be presented that exhibit the existence of U-cycles for class-alternating words such as alternating vowel-consonant (VCVC) words; words with at least one repeated letter (non-injective functions); words with at least one letter of the alphabet missing (functions that are not onto); words that represent illegal tournament rankings; and words that do not constitute "strong"…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
Topicssemigroups and automata theory · Advanced Combinatorial Mathematics · Coding theory and cryptography
