Approximating 1-dimensional TSP Requires Omega(n log n) Comparisons
Neal E. Young

TL;DR
This paper proves that any comparison-based algorithm approximating the 1-dimensional TSP within a certain factor must perform at least on the order of n log n comparisons, establishing a fundamental complexity limit.
Contribution
It provides a concise proof that approximating 1D TSP within a specific ratio inherently requires Omega(n log n) comparisons, highlighting a key complexity barrier.
Findings
Comparison-based n^(1-epsilon)-approximation algorithms need Omega(n log n) comparisons
Establishes a lower bound on the complexity of 1D TSP approximation
Shows fundamental limitations for comparison-based approaches
Abstract
We give a short proof that any comparison-based n^(1-epsilon)-approximation algorithm for the 1-dimensional Traveling Salesman Problem (TSP) requires Omega(n log n) comparisons.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComputational Geometry and Mesh Generation · Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs · Optimization and Packing Problems
