The subset argument and consistency of MLE in GLMM: Answer to an open problem and beyond
Jiming Jiang

TL;DR
This paper addresses an open problem about the consistency of MLEs in GLMMs with crossed random effects, introducing a novel approach that extends to general models and demonstrates the technique with an example.
Contribution
It provides a new nonstandard method for proving MLE consistency in dependent data scenarios, solving an open problem and broadening applicability to general GLMMs.
Findings
Resolved an open problem on MLE consistency in GLMMs with crossed effects.
Developed a novel technique for dependent observations.
Extended results to general GLMMs with illustrative example.
Abstract
We give answer to an open problem regarding consistency of the maximum likelihood estimators (MLEs) in generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) involving crossed random effects. The solution to the open problem introduces an interesting, nonstandard approach to proving consistency of the MLEs in cases of dependent observations. Using the new technique, we extend the results to MLEs under a general GLMM. An example is used to further illustrate the technique.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
