Proof of the hypothesis Edmonds's, not polynomial of NPC-problems and classification of the problems with polynomial certificates
B.S. Kochkarev

TL;DR
This paper argues that P is not equal to NP, refutes the common belief, and classifies problems with polynomial certificates, claiming all NP-complete problems are not polynomial.
Contribution
It provides a proof that P does not equal NP and offers a classification of problems based on their polynomial certificates, challenging established complexity theory.
Findings
P is not equal to NP according to the paper
All NP-complete problems are not polynomial
A new classification of problems with polynomial certificates
Abstract
We show that the affirmation (in computer science) erroneously and we prove the justice of the hypotesis J.Edmonds's . We show further that all the -complete problems is not polynomial and we give the classification of the problems with the polynomial certificates.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComputability, Logic, AI Algorithms · Algorithms and Data Compression · Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs
