Simulations and Bisimulations For Coalgebraic Modal Logics
Daniel Gor\'in, Lutz Schr\"oder

TL;DR
This paper introduces a modular notion of simulation and bisimulation for coalgebraic modal logics, establishing their adequacy and equivalence with T-behavioral equivalence under various conditions.
Contribution
It defines Lambda-simulation and Lambda-bisimulation for coalgebraic modal logics, connecting them to T-behavioral equivalence and extending the understanding of behavioral equivalences.
Findings
Lambda-bisimulations correspond to T-behavioral equivalence
Lambda-simulation preserves truth of positive formulas
Difunctional Lambda-bisimulations are T-bisimulations under certain conditions
Abstract
We define a notion of Lambda-simulation for coalgebraic modal logics, parametric on the choice Lambda of predicate liftings for a functor T. We show this notion is adequate in several ways: i) it preserves truth of positive formulas, ii) for Lambda a separating set of monotone predicate liftings, the associated notion of Lambda-bisimulation corresponds to T-behavioural equivalence (moreover Lambda-n-bisimulations correspond to T-n-behavioural equivalence), and iii) in fact, for Lambda-separating and T preserving weak pullbacks, difunctional Lambda-bisimulations are T-bisimulations. In essence, we arrive at a modular notion of equivalence that, when used with a separating set of monotone predicate liftings, coincides with T-behavioural equivalence regardless of whether T preserves weak pullbacks (unlike the notion of T-bisimilarity).
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
