Probing the role of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the photoelectric heating within photodissociation regions
Yoko Okada (1), Paolo Pilleri (2,3,4), Olivier Bern\'e (5,6), Volker, Ossenkopf (1), Asunci\'on Fuente (3), Javier R. Goicoechea (2), Christine, Joblin (5,6), Carsten Kramer (7), Markus R\"ollig (1), David Teyssier (8),, Floris F. S. van der Tak (9

TL;DR
This study investigates how the charge state of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) influences photoelectric heating efficiency in photodissociation regions, finding that positively charged PAHs reduce heating efficiency and that observations align well with theoretical models.
Contribution
It provides observational evidence linking PAH charge states to heating efficiency and compares these findings with theoretical predictions, highlighting PAHs' dominant role in photoelectric heating.
Findings
High PAH+ fraction correlates with low heating efficiency.
Observed efficiency depends on PAH charge state, supporting theoretical models.
Discrepancies at low gamma highlight areas for further research.
Abstract
We observationally investigate the relation between the photoelectric heating efficiency in PDRs and the charge of PAHs, which are considered to play a key role in photoelectric heating. Using PACS onboard Herschel, we observed six PDRs spanning a wide range of FUV radiation fields (G_0=100-10^5). To measure the photoelectric heating efficiency, we obtained the intensities of the main cooling lines, i.e., the [OI]63um, 145um, and [CII]158um, as well as the FIR continuum intensity. We used Spitzer/IRS spectroscopic mapping observations to investigate the MIR PAH features in the same regions. We decomposed the MIR PAH emission into that of neutral (PAH^0) and positively ionized (PAH^+) species to derive the fraction of the positively charged PAHs, and compare it to the photoelectric heating efficiency. The heating efficiency traced by ([OI]63um+[OI]145um+[CII]158um) / TIR, ranges between…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
