A near-infrared relationship for estimating black hole masses in active galactic nuclei
Hermine Landt (1), Martin J. Ward (1), Bradley M. Peterson (2), Misty, C. Bentz (3), Martin Elvis (4), Kirk T. Korista (5), Margarita Karovska (4), ((1) Durham University, (2) Ohio State University, (3) Georgia State, University, (4) Harvard-Smithsonian CfA

TL;DR
This paper refines a near-infrared method for estimating black hole masses in active galactic nuclei by expanding the sample size and improving calibration, leveraging less dust extinction and clearer emission lines.
Contribution
The study enhances the near-IR black hole mass relationship calibration by increasing the reverberation-mapped AGN sample from 14 to 23, especially at high luminosities.
Findings
Improved calibration accuracy of the near-IR mass relationship.
Expanded sample size enhances high-luminosity AGN estimates.
Near-IR method reduces dust extinction effects.
Abstract
Black hole masses for samples of active galactic nuclei (AGN) are currently estimated from single-epoch optical spectra using scaling relations anchored in reverberation mapping results. In particular, the two quantities needed for calculating black hole masses, namely, the velocity and the radial distance of the orbiting gas are derived from the widths of the Balmer hydrogen broad emission lines and the optical continuum luminosity, respectively. We have recently presented a near-infrared (near-IR) relationship for estimating AGN black hole masses based on the widths of the Paschen hydrogen broad emission lines and the total 1 micron continuum luminosity. The near-IR offers several advantages over the optical: it suffers less from dust extinction, the AGN continuum is observed only weakly contaminated by the host galaxy and the strongest Paschen broad emission lines Pa alpha and Pa…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
