SN 2009js at the crossroads between normal and subluminous Type IIP supernovae: optical and mid-infrared evolution
P. Gandhi, M. Yamanaka, M. Tanaka, T. Nozawa, K.S. Kawabata, I., Saviane, K. Maeda, T.J. Moriya, T. Hattori, M. Sasada, R. Itoh

TL;DR
SN 2009js exhibits characteristics bridging normal and subluminous Type IIP supernovae, with unique optical and mid-infrared evolution, low nickel mass, and early dust or molecule formation evidence.
Contribution
This is the first detailed mid-infrared study of a subluminous Type IIP supernova, revealing early dust or CO emission and bridging properties between different luminosity classes.
Findings
SN 2009js shares features with both subluminous and intermediate luminosity SNe.
It shows a smaller decline in bolometric luminosity than similar SNe.
Detected early mid-infrared excess suggestive of dust or CO emission.
Abstract
We present a study of SN 2009js in NGC 918. Multi-band Kanata optical photometry covering the first ~120 days show the source to be a Type IIP SN. Reddening is dominated by that due to our Galaxy. One-year-post-explosion photometry with the NTT, and a Subaru optical spectrum 16 days post-discovery, both imply a good match with the well-studied subluminous SN 2005cs. The plateau phase luminosity of SN 2009js and its plateau duration are more similar to the intermediate luminosity IIP SN 2008in. Thus, SN 2009js shares characteristics with both subluminous and intermediate luminosity SNe. Its radioactive tail luminosity lies between SN 2005cs and SN 2008in, whereas its quasi-bolometric luminosity decline from peak to plateau (quantified by a newly-defined parameter Delta[logL] measuring adiabatic cooling following shock breakout) is much smaller than both the others. We estimate the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
