A Bayesian Variant of Shafer's Commonalities For Modelling Unforeseen Events
Robert F. Bordley

TL;DR
This paper introduces a Bayesian approach to model unforeseen events by integrating Shafer's commonalities, aiming to reconcile Bayesian probability with Shafer's belief theory in decision-making under uncertainty.
Contribution
It develops a Bayesian variant of Shafer's commonalities, enabling the inclusion of unforeseen events in expected utility theory.
Findings
Bayesian variant of Shafer's commonalities models unforeseen events.
Unified framework for Bayesian probability and Shafer's belief theory.
Enhanced decision analysis incorporating unforeseen events.
Abstract
Shafer's theory of belief and the Bayesian theory of probability are two alternative and mutually inconsistent approaches toward modelling uncertainty in artificial intelligence. To help reduce the conflict between these two approaches, this paper reexamines expected utility theory-from which Bayesian probability theory is derived. Expected utility theory requires the decision maker to assign a utility to each decision conditioned on every possible event that might occur. But frequently the decision maker cannot foresee all the events that might occur, i.e., one of the possible events is the occurrence of an unforeseen event. So once we acknowledge the existence of unforeseen events, we need to develop some way of assigning utilities to decisions conditioned on unforeseen events. The commonsensical solution to this problem is to assign similar utilities to events which are similar.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBayesian Modeling and Causal Inference · Multi-Criteria Decision Making · Rough Sets and Fuzzy Logic
