Qualitative Measures of Ambiguity
Michael S. K. M. Wong, Z. W. Wang

TL;DR
This paper proposes a qualitative measure of ambiguity to better understand uncertain knowledge, distinguishing it from probability-based uncertainty and analyzing its relationship with other uncertainty measures.
Contribution
It introduces a new qualitative ambiguity measure and explores its relationship with existing uncertainty measures, enhancing the understanding of uncertain knowledge.
Findings
Ambiguity is distinct from probability-based uncertainty.
The qualitative measure captures vagueness in judgments.
Ambiguity is an important aspect of uncertain knowledge.
Abstract
This paper introduces a qualitative measure of ambiguity and analyses its relationship with other measures of uncertainty. Probability measures relative likelihoods, while ambiguity measures vagueness surrounding those judgments. Ambiguity is an important representation of uncertain knowledge. It deals with a different, type of uncertainty modeled by subjective probability or belief.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMulti-Criteria Decision Making
