
TL;DR
This paper introduces argument networks, a graphical framework inspired by Bayesian networks, to facilitate reasoning in propositional argument databases, enabling applications like nonmonotonic reasoning and diagnosis.
Contribution
It proposes a novel graphical representation called argument networks and an associated reasoning algorithm for propositional argument databases.
Findings
Argument networks resemble Bayesian networks in structure.
The reasoning algorithm is efficient and similar to Bayesian network algorithms.
Applications include nonmonotonic reasoning, truth maintenance, and diagnosis.
Abstract
A major reason behind the success of probability calculus is that it possesses a number of valuable tools, which are based on the notion of probabilistic independence. In this paper, I identify a notion of logical independence that makes some of these tools available to a class of propositional databases, called argument databases. Specifically, I suggest a graphical representation of argument databases, called argument networks, which resemble Bayesian networks. I also suggest an algorithm for reasoning with argument networks, which resembles a basic algorithm for reasoning with Bayesian networks. Finally, I show that argument networks have several applications: Nonmonotonic reasoning, truth maintenance, and diagnosis.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBayesian Modeling and Causal Inference · Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge · Semantic Web and Ontologies
